PDF and JPG solve different problems. Choosing wrong is usually not catastrophic, but it does make life harder for whoever receives the file.
A PDF is a document container. It can hold multiple pages, vector text, fonts, links, form fields and bookmarks, and it is designed to look the same everywhere.
A JPG is a single compressed image. It has no pages, no text layer and no structure — just pixels. It is designed to be small and universally viewable.
This is where PDF usually wins. Text in a PDF is stored as vector outlines plus a font reference, so it renders crisply at any zoom and prints at the printer's full resolution. Text in a JPG is already pixels; zoom in and it blurs, and printing a 96 dpi image on a 600 dpi laser printer looks visibly soft.
PDF to JPG throws away structure — you cannot get the text layer back without OCR. JPG to PDF adds structure but cannot magically make pixels sharper. Both conversions are one-way in terms of quality, so keep the original whichever direction you go.
People sometimes describe a PDF as if it were an image format because PDFs of scans are images inside. If your PDF came from a scanner, it behaves like a JPG collection — no searchable text, large file, degrades when compressed. That is a property of how it was made, not of PDF itself.
Try it now: JPG to PDF · PDF to JPG